[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2025) - SSR 24-2p & new 5-year rule regarding past work, assistive device, medical opinions Plaintiff opposed the remand

Plaintiff  opposed the remand

District Judge Robert B

not persuasive

1) Whether time sought opposing a remand for further proceedings is compensable under the EAJA

RFC - lack of support for findings

[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2025) - SSR 24-2p & new 5-year rule regarding past work, assistive device, medical opinions Plaintiff opposed the remand[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 1: 24 CV 22626, 2025 WL 1754675 (S. D. Fla. May 13, 2025) (Opinion by U. S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Reply Brief; and court decision Topics addressed: RFC assistive device Past relevant work as generally performed Past relevant work not performed at SGA level Past relevant work 5 year rule Medical opinions