Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 1) The ALJ’s reasons for

1)  The ALJ’s reasons for finding the opinion of Roberta Strangfeld Russell

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief and court decision remanding with directions to award benefits

the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to give further consideration to the residual functional capacity

2)  The ALJ failed to properly consider the lay evidence from Angel L

Specific impairments - stroke

Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 1) The ALJ’s reasons forSharon H. v. Commr of Soc. Security Admin., Case No. 2: 23 cv 00468 RMG MGB (D. S. C. Sept. 15, 2023) (Order by U. S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Contested Motion for Entry of Social Security Judgment, and remand order Topics addressed: Severity standard breaks due to incontinence RFC treatment regimen Past relevant work composite jobs Evaluation of depression Incontinence